I was listening to a podcast on Issues Etc. earlier this week and I was struck by a profound thought. The title of the podcast was “The Vocation of Minister.” I’d normally link directly to it but the site appears to be down as I’m writing this, nothing will load.

The guest speaker was talking about how the word minister means “servant,” but most churches today prefer to look to ministers as leaders or CEO’s, and ministers are all too happy to accept this role. The proper role of a minister is that of a servant, and his chief task is to “administer” what God has given, His gifts.

The guest speaker then said this:

“We approach [the vocation of the minister] as a social issue, we look at what the people want. Let’s look at the word ministry. There’s an old saying… ‘The customer is always right.’ The customer knows what he wants and if you’re going to serve the customer, you better give him what he wants or you’re not going to do business with him. That’s precisely wrong when it comes to the church, because the customer is always wrong. And God is always right.

In other words, we must approach the vocation of the minister theologically (not socially). A minister of God must often preach God’s Law and His Gospel to people who don’t want any part of it. Often people don’t realize the depth of their sinfulness (including me), and they must hear God’s Law. Other times the Law has done its work and people have been cut to the heart, then they need to hear the Gospel. The customer (not a good term but I’m using it simply to make a point) is always wrong. He doesn’t want what he really needs. I am so often guilty of this. I often want authenticity, community, and whatever – but what I really need is the forgiveness of sins through Jesus Christ. These other things are secondary to this primary need.

It is too easy to lose sight of Christ as the focal point of our churches when we operate with the assumption that the folks in the pews are right. That’s how we get mega-churches that acquiesce to, rather than transform, culture. Give the people what they want and you will grow numerically, but that’s not how ministry progress ought to be measured.

I am preparing a post on Steve Munsey, but found that I first needed to explain some of the heresies that he teaches, namely positive confession and the prosperity gospel. One of my favorite tunes is a song called “Wedding Dress” by Derek Webb. There’s a line in the song that asks,

And should I read between the lines,
To look for blessings in disguise
To make me handsome, rich and wise?
Is that really what you want?

That’s a valid question. Does God want me to be healthy and wealthy, as the prosperity gospel teaches? Most Christian leaders condemn the “prosperity gospel,” yet observers say it is enjoying new popularity in this economically tenuous time, when many people are not prospering. What’s come to be known as the prosperity gospel began as a staple of fire-and-brimstone preaching in early 20th-century revival meetings. It surged in popularity with television preachers in the 1980s, until scandals revealed that some preachers used money donated for ministry to support their own lavish lifestyles.

Now observers say the prosperity gospel is spreading among churches large and small, denominational and independent, as well as through the ministries of televangelists such as Creflo Dollar, Joyce Meyer, Paula White, Steve Munsey, Paul Couch and Kenneth Copeland. These pastors, critics say, encourage their followers to “sow a seed” of faith by spending money – often in the form of a donation to their ministries – in order to reap prosperity in the future. Please note that I recognize that many people have been blessed through these ministries, but I must point out their participation and support of this misleading and dangerous doctrine.

Many Christian leaders have long condemned the prosperity gospel as aberrant theology, but most did so quietly. No more. In the past year, African-American pastors met at a national conference to discuss a problem they see spreading in their denominations. Critics have even questioned the ministries of such nationally prominent megapastors as T.D. Jakes – whose Potter’s House does extensive outreach to the poor — and Joel Osteen — pastor of Lakewood Church, the largest megachurch in the country — saying their brand of divinely assisted self-improvement is just a vamped-up version of the prosperity gospel.

Listen to these quotes from and about Jim Bakker, after his release from 5 years in prison for defrauding Heritage USA investors:

“I’d always quoted 3 John 2, saying, ‘Above all things God wants you to prosper.’ I loved that Scripture. It looks great on a TV screen when you’re raising funds, and I interpreted it as God wants you to be rich. But when I got to the words of John, I said, ‘Now this don’t make sense.’ So I took the word prosper apart in the Greek and found out it’s made up of two words-the first word means good or well and the second road. It’s a progressive word, so it’s like a journey. So, here’s John saying, basically, ‘Beloved, I want you to have a good journey through life as your soul has a good journey to heaven.’ It was a greeting! Building theology on that is like building the church on ‘Have a nice day.’ …

I began to look up all the Scriptures used in prosperity teaching, such as ‘Give and it shall be given unto you.’ When I put that Scripture back into its context, I found Christ was teaching on forgiveness, not on money. He was teaching us that by the same measure that we forgive, we will be forgiven. . . .

I had gotten my sermons from other people. The Bible warns about the shepherds who get their messages from each other. I think today the reason we have another gospel and another Jesus being preached is because men have gotten their sermons from each other and from motivational teaching. A lot of what’s being taught today is simply motivational teaching with a few Scriptures put to it” (Source: The Re-education of Jim Bakker, ChristianityToday.com, Dec. 7, 1998).

“Bakker . . . says he has had a change of heart about the prosperity gospel. . . .

The same man who once told his PTL coworkers that ‘God wants you to be rich,’ now says he made a tragic mistake. . . .

‘For years, I helped propagate an impostor, not a true gospel, but another gospel,’ Bakker has said in his 1996 book, ‘I Was Wrong.’ …

‘The prosperity message did not line up with the tenor of the Scripture,’ he said. ‘My heart was crushed to think that I led so many people astray’” (Source: The prosperity gospel, St. Louis Post-Dispatch, USA, Nov. 18, 2003).

But won’t God show us more signs and wonders and great prosperity in these last days?

People keep talking about a great end times revival, when Scripture seems to suggest mass persecution and deception in His name – the “counterfeit bride” of 2 Corinthians 4:4 and Revelation 17:5, the great whore/harlot. The end times will be full of signs and wonders, where people will chase after divine healing, prosperity and health – but will miss the whole point of the gospel. In Luke 13, when Jesus was going from town to town on His way to Jerusalem, “someone asked Him, ‘Lord, are only a few people going to be saved?’ He said to them, ‘Make every effort to enter through the narrow door, because many, I tell you, will try to enter and will not be able to. . . .’ He will answer, ‘I don’t know you or where you come from. Away from me, all you evildoers!’” (Luke 13:23-27). In Matthew 7:21-23 Jesus says, “Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only he who does the will of my Father who is in heaven. Many will say to me on that day, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and in your name drive out demons and perform many miracles?’ Then I will tell them plainly, ‘I never knew you. Away from me, you evildoers!’” We cannot chase after signs, wonders, healings and miracles and some sort of end times revival. We must seek Christ alone and doing His will, even if His will does not ask us to operate in the realm of the supernatural. This is not to say that He won’t ask us to heal and do miraculous things, but as always, we must seek Him first and allow Him to give us direction in these matters. We mustn’t try to compete with the emerging church, new wine, and G12/cell church movements, which are heretical.

Then what is the “true” gospel?

The gospel is so simple, yet it is so common for people to leave out essential elements (or to add things like physical healing or prosperity). We must understand that eternal life is a free gift (Romans 6:23). It is not earned or deserved (Ephesians 2:8-9). No one can earn their way into heaven, because we are all sinful (Romans 3:23). Because of our sinfulness, we cannot save ourselves, we are not perfect (Matthew 5:48). However, in spite of our sin, God is merciful and does not want to punish us (1 John 4:8; Jeremiah 31:3). But the Bible also tells us that God is just, and as such He must punish sin (Exodus 34:7; Ezekiel 18:4). This creates a problem! God loves us and doesn’t want to punish us, but at the same time He is just and must punish sin. God solves this problem for us in the person and work of Jesus Christ, who came to earth and was fully God and fully man (John 1:1, 14)! What exactly did He do on earth? He died on the cross in order to pay the penalty for our sins and He rose from the grave to purchase a place for us in Heaven (Isaiah 53:6; 1 Corinthians 15:1-6). Jesus Christ bore our sin in His body on the cross and now offers us eternal life (Heaven) as a free gift. This gift is received by faith (Acts 16:31), which itself is a gift from God (Romans 12:3; 1 Corinthians 12:3; Ephesians 2:8-9; Hebrews 12:2).

In light of all this, Paul says in Galatians 1:9 – “If anybody is preaching to you a gospel other than what you accepted, let him be eternally condemned!” The true Gospel of scripture is not a gospel of earthly prosperity nor of physical healing. It is a gospel of eternal salvation.

Thanks for reading this three-part series on positive confession and the prosperity gospel. I hope it shed some light on this dangerous heresy. Please read all three posts before trying to argue based on one of them, thank you

As I am preparing my blog post on Steve Munsey, I realized that I must first teach on the issues of positive confession and the prosperity Gospel, two erroneous doctrines that Munsey teaches. Part 1 defines these heresies and gives a simple response to them. This post is a quote from Chuck Smith in his book Answers for Today, where he talks about praying according to God’s will:

“We have this confidence in Him, ‘If we ask anything according to His will, He hears us.’ I’m so glad that qualification is there! I’m glad that this Scripture doesn’t say, ‘Whatever we ask we receive.’ I’m very grateful that He inserted ‘according to His will.’ Had God answered all of my prayers, I wouldn’t be here today. I would have destroyed myself a long time ago!

I have prayed for a lot of ridiculous things that would have totally ruined me. “According to His will” keeps a proper perspective between God and me. Any other way would remove the authority of God over my life. It would then mean that I was the master of my fate, the captain of my destiny. My life wouldn’t be governed by God; instead, it would be governed by me.

If I can demand that God does anything, if I can lay out demands to which God must acquiesce because I’m demanding it in Jesus’ name; or if I can just make positive confessions and start laying claims to things and, by my positive confessions, create situations and things for my life, then God is no longer in control of my life. I take control by the demands that I make upon God and by the confessions I make of these things. And God becomes the magic genie! I rub the lamp and God must come out to follow my orders.

Not so! God is far too loving for that. He loves you too much to let you run your life. When you put the “I” in “run,” you’ve got the true picture: you’ll ‘ruin’ your life when you try to run it.

Paul tells us that we don’t always know what the will of the Lord is. That’s one of our problems in prayer. From past experience, I realize that I made so many mistakes in the analyses of my own needs that if God had answered some of those prayers, it would have been absolutely tragic!

What if I were in control? What if God were acquiescing to every confession that I made? People say, “Be careful not to make a negative confession! What you say is what you get.” That’s ridiculous!

David said, ‘I know one day Saul is going to kill me.’ Don’t say that, David! That’s negative confession. Now it’s going to happen, because what you say is what you get! And now one day Saul is going to kill you. But Saul didn’t kill David.

I have a good friend who’s been saying for years, ‘I’ll be a monkey’s uncle.’ To my knowledge he hasn’t become one yet.

‘If I could have things by just making a positive confession.’ ‘If God must yield to my demands.’ Do you see what that immediately does? It elevates me to the position of God and puts God in the subservient position. I’m no longer serving God, but God is serving me and my every whim.

Certainly, the greatest prayer any of us can ever pray is, ‘Not my will, but Thy will be done.’ That isn’t a spiritual cop-out as some people would accuse. It’s just glorifying God as God and recognizing that He’s a lot smarter than I. I may think that something is best for me, but He knows what’s best for me.

Behind every prayer I offer is an understanding with God that if I’m making a stupid request, He should please not honor it or answer it. I want God to do what’s best for me or whatever is wisest in each situation. If you accuse me of a spiritual cop-out because I pray ‘Thy will be done,’ then you must also accuse Jesus Christ of a spiritual copout-because He’s the source of the prayer!

If God should come to me and say, ‘Chuck, I’ve been thinking about you lately. I’d like to do something special for you just to show you how much I love you’-what would I ask Him for? Oh, what will it be? Let’s see…I might pay off the mortgage on my house. ‘Lord, what about twenty grand?’ No. Before I get that far I’d stop and say, ‘Lord, just give me whatever You want.’ You see, I might be thinking of twenty grand, but He might be thinking five hundred thousand! Why should I cut Him short?

God delights in giving good gifts to His children. He’s more anxious to give than we are to receive! If you can have the proper concept of God then you can, with confidence, totally cast yourself upon Him and say, ‘Here I am, God! It’s Your problem now! Take care of it. Whatever You want, whatever You wish. My life is Yours. You work out all the details and circumstances. I’m going to relax and let You do it!’ You won’t be able to believe those things He desires to do for your life-just because He loves you! No way am I afraid to say, ‘Lord, Thy will be done in this situation.’ That’s all I want.”

Without sound biblical teaching regarding prayer, people will be deceived into being ineffective and frustrated in their prayer lives. When we understand how to pray and claim God’s word and not use His words out of context, we will find ourselves in line with His holy and perfect will.

I personally experienced this when I was struggling with the death of my former pastor, Steve Szoke. I wrote extensively about the dangers of positive confession and false teachings about physical healing as I grappled with his suffering and eventual death.

We’ll never understand why some people are healed and others are not, why some notorious sinners enjoy marvelous health while some sincere Christians suffer from chronic illnesses. It frustrates me, but I know that the God in whom I place my hope is a sure foundation. I can’t even begin to relate to what Steve and his family have gone through, but I have a mighty Savior who can. And my job isn’t to give an answer to the question “why?” I’d be foolish to do so. I am simply to point them to Christ, who has suffered in every way and can relate to them and walk with them.

Look for part 3 tomorrow, the final part of this series, where we will compare the prosperity gospel to the biblical gospel. Also, I will be quoting Jim Bakker’s book I Was Wrong, sharing wisdom from a man who learned this the hard way.

I’m gearing up for a lengthy post on Steve Munsey. But there are two important heresies that first need to be understood prior to discussing his teachings. The first danger that many preachers buy into, including Munsey, Joel Osteen and many others, is the “positive confession” teaching from motivational business philosophy. It stresses the inherent power of words and thoughts. Each person predestines his own future by what he says verbally and by how well he uses spiritual laws. As such, it is as if we live in a mechanistic universe instead of a personal one. This erroneous doctrine is often taught alongside the prosperity gospel. The “prosperity gospel” is the teaching that God will reward signs of faith with health and wealth. It was popularized by a number of preachers during the 1950s, especially by Oral Roberts and his Expect a Miracle television broadcasts. It is also called “Word of Faith,” “name it and claim it,” “blab it and grab it,” “health and wealth gospel” and “positive confession.”

Let me begin by saying that I am not trying to preach some sort of intellectual legalism in how we must teach, but we must be careful to teach what Scripture is saying about prosperity, not what motivational speakers have to say misusing Scripture to back it up. The Bible guarantees no health or wealth to followers, but it does show we will have joy in suffering and that we will overcome the world. Our treasure needs to be in heaven. I am not saying we cannot accumulate earthly wealth, but if it remains the focus of our preaching it will become the object of our faith. There must be balance, we must teach the entirety of the word of God and warn people of the days ahead as well as encourage them with God’s blessings.

The basic premise of ‘positive confession’ is:

• God created things by speaking them into existence.
• We are created in God’s image.
• Therefore we, too, can create things (or situations) by speaking them into existence.

There is great power in our words – life and death! This teaching is accurate in many respects, but we must also be careful to teach this using Scripture, not Zig Zigler and other business leaders.

Did Jesus promise to give literally anything we ask for in faith?

In Mark 11:23-24, Jesus said, “I tell you the truth, if anyone says to this mountain, ‘Go, throw yourself into the sea,’ and does not doubt in his heart but believes that what he says will happen, it will be done for him. Therefore I tell you, whatever you ask for in prayer, believe that you have received it, and it will be yours.” On the surface, this verse seems to be saying that God will grant literally any request we make of Him as long as we believe.

However, it is important to recognize that there are limitations on what God will give, which is indicated both by the context and by other texts, as well as by the laws of God’s own nature and the universe.

Second, all passages should be interpreted in harmony with other clear statements of Scripture. As an illustration, it is clear that God does not promise to heal everyone for whom we pray in faith. Paul wasn’t healed, though he prayed earnestly and faithfully (2 Corinthians 12:8-9). Jesus taught that it was not the blind man’s lack of faith that hindered his being healed. Rather, he was born blind “that the works of God should be revealed in him” (John 9:3). Despite the apostle Paul’s divine ability to heal others (Acts 28:9), later he apparently could not heal either Epaphroditus (Philippians 2:25) or Trophimus (2 Timothy 4:20). It clearly was not unbelief that brought Job’s sickness on him (Job 1:1).

Finally, when the rest of Scripture is taken into consideration there are clear conditions placed on God’s promise to answer prayer in addition to faith. We must “abide in Him” and let His Word “abide in us” (John 15:7). We cannot “ask with wrong motives,” out of our own selfishness (James 4:3). Furthermore, we must ask “according to His will” (1 John 5:14). Indeed, on all except God’s unconditional promises, this “if it be your will” must always be stated or implied. This is not a cop-out, it’s how Jesus taught us to pray!

Look for part 2 tomorrow, which will contain a great quote about praying according to God’s will.

Dick Rockenbach contacted me via email about this, then he posted it on Facebook:

This made me start wondering about codependency and the church’s relationship with clergy members. Here’s the definition of codependency from Way 2 Hope, an organization that helps those in codependent relationships:

Codependency is a condition that results in a dysfunctional relationship between the codependent and other people. A codependent is addicted to helping someone. They need to be needed. This addiction is sometimes so strong, the codependent will cause the other person to continue to be needy. This behavior is called enabling. The enabler will purposefully overlook someone abusing a child, will call in sick for someone suffering from addiction, will put roadblocks to prevent their child from becoming independent, or even keep a sick family member from getting the treatment that would make them well. These are behaviors common to codependents. A codependent often suffers from a ‘Messiah Complex’ where he sees problems with everyone and sees himself as the only person who can help. Here is where I need to work…trying to be ‘Mr. Fixit’ for everyone…even those who don’t feel they need anything fixed. A codependent counselor (common) will never think your sessions are done. In fact, they often create issues that weren’t there just so they can continue to feel they’re an important, no, essential part of your life. This is one of the reasons I always spend the first counseling session evaluating the problem and setting up a schedule of sessions to complete the work. If we’re not making progress, I don’t want to become the person you feel you have to take every problem to…it’s too addictive to me. That’s what codependence is…an addiction to being needed.

So how did this codependency develop? Clearly it is because of clergy-members’ addiction to being needed. This addiction is easy for any of us to fall into, but especially for those who are in positions where people come to them for help. But this doesn’t let the so-called “lay people” off the hook, either. They enable the clergy by continuing to look to them as having the answers to all of life’s problems. Thus the clergy maintain codependency among the “laity” by being all too eager to give an answer to any question, even when the answer is not or cannot be known, and the “laity” enable the clergy by remaining ignorant and relying on them for spiritual growth.

This has birthed not a few generations of biblically illiterate believers, returning us to the sacerdotalism that Martin Luther and the Reformers fought so hard to eradicate. Thanks to Sunday School (which, at its inception, was heavily opposed on grounds that it would destroy the father’s role as the spiritual head of his family), we now have codependency between humans rather than independence from man and dependence only upon Christ.

But it is not only clergy and laity who do this. This also happens among many other informal relationships, where those who are recognized as leaders become codependent with their followers/disciples, and home-based fellowships become cult-like in their codependency. Neither institutional nor organic ministry models are exempt.

But simply identifying the problem doesn’t help. What can be done to change this? The first important thing to understand is that codependency is possible for anyone because of mankind’s propensity towards sin, particularly pride and idolatry. Second, we must realize that we have a loving God who is able to set us free from codependent relationships and direct us toward Himself. Third, we must break the cycle. This means that leaders must be willing to admit when they don’t know the answers, and be willing to refer people to other sources for help and knowledge, teaching disciples to feed themselves, not just to wait for the leader’s spoon. Followers must stop enabling the leaders and begin seeking answers and help from other sources, most specifically from Christ Himself via His Word.

By the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Holy Spirit will enable us in a positive way to break free from the spiritually dangerous cycle of codependency, moving on towards maturity and freedom in Christ.

It seems that Christophobia is rampant these days. Nothing causes such a stir as two simple words: “Jesus Christ.” Have you ever noticed that if a chaplain closes a prayer “in Jesus’ name,” it makes headlines, but if a religious leader prays to Allah, Benevolent Spirit, Jehovah, etc. no one bats an eye? Why is it that when people hit their thumb with a hammer they yell “JESUS CHRIST!” They don’t yell “BUDDHA” or “ALLAH!” It just doesn’t happen very often. It makes one wonder….

The folks who seem to fear the most when the politically incorrect name of Jesus is invoked are Christians. That’s the ironic part. I know lots of Christians who almost cringe at the mention of Jesus’ name in so-called “secular” realms.

And we seem to excuse this behavior. We seem to empathize when people hide their affiliation with Christ for job security, or to maintain a “normal” social image. Aside from DC Talk, no one wants to be labeled a “Jesus freak.”

[Jesus said,] “If anyone is ashamed of me and my words, the Son of Man will be ashamed of him when he comes in his glory and in the glory of the Father and of the holy angels” (Luke 9:26).

I sometimes wonder if those who fear the name of Jesus really understand the profoundness of the Gospel. I wonder if they really know the depths of His love.

Sometimes they are unable to know the depths of His love because they do not know the depths of their sin. If your sin is small, then your Savior will also be small. But when we recognize how depraved we really are, we can only exclaim with St. Paul,

“I am not ashamed of the gospel, because it is the power of God for the salvation of everyone who believes” (Romans 1:16).

“Everyone” includes you and me. Everyone includes your coworkers, the media, your students, your teachers, your boss, your family, your friends, and your neighbors. How can we pray for the Gospel to be spread when we are ashamed of it? Political correctness is part of our (fallen) culture. We are called to remain “aliens and strangers in the world” (1 Peter 2:11), to be in the world but not of it (John 17:13-18). At times this will involve breaking cultural taboos. Even if it costs us our jobs or our very lives.

“For whoever wants to save his life will lose it, but whoever loses his life for me and for the gospel will save it” (Mark 8:35).

But take heart, we have a great and loving God. Be thankful.

“For God did not give us a spirit of timidity, but a spirit of power, of love and of self-discipline. So do not be ashamed to testify about our Lord, or ashamed of me his prisoner. But join with me in suffering for the gospel, by the power of God, who has saved us and called us to a holy life—not because of anything we have done but because of his own purpose and grace. This grace was given us in Christ Jesus before the beginning of time, but it has now been revealed through the appearing of our Savior, Christ Jesus, who has destroyed death and has brought life and immortality to light through the gospel. And of this gospel I was appointed a herald and an apostle and a teacher. That is why I am suffering as I am. Yet I am not ashamed, because I know whom I have believed, and am convinced that he is able to guard what I have entrusted to him for that day.

What you heard from me, keep as the pattern of sound teaching, with faith and love in Christ Jesus. Guard the good deposit that was entrusted to you—guard it with the help of the Holy Spirit who lives in us.” (1 Timothy 1:7-14).

I was actually writing a post about the social gospel, and then I ran across Daniel and Heather’s blog post on the subject. I couldn’t have said it better….

I also recently discussed this on my post about preaching the gospel without words. Be sure to read the comments for the discussion and feel free to chime in!

I’m currently reading a book entitled The Spirituality of the Cross: The Way of the First Evangelicals by Gene Edward Veith, Jr. It’s been a very enlightening book that talks about what constitutes genuine spirituality. I was struck by this quote:

By “spirituality,” I do not mean any kind of content-free, theologically-vacuous quest for transcendent experiences for their own sake. Rather, “spirituality” has to do precisely with the content, what fills abstract theology, mundane institutions, and the everyday life of the Christian with their real substance.

The quest for this kind of spirituality is, I think, genuine and important. Many people today, in our shallow, mass-produced, materialistic culture, yearn for depth, for richness, for transcendence. Many do not even find spiritual substance in their churches, many of which have adopted the slick superficialities and manipulative commercialism of American pop culture, mutating into what can only be described as pop-Christianity. Interestingly, many casualties of pop-Christianity are drifting into older faiths that do seem to offer a measure of spiritual substance. A huge exodus is taking place from Protestantism into the Roman Catholic Church and, perhaps even more significantly, into Eastern Orthodoxy (p. 14).

In the past I’ve written that for most folks in our society, it is cool to search for God, but it’s not so cool to find Him, but the meaningless fad “spirituality” that our culture seems obsessed with seems to run deeper than just our culture. This culture has also permeated the church. I myself have even spoken with an Eastern Orthodox priest and my wife and I attended a young adult ministry of the Roman Catholic Church. Why? Because we have been yearning for substance, not the fluff that consumes our culture and most Protestant churches.

Much of American Protestantism has become little more than another false religion on the smorgasbord of faith groups, because it has drifted into moralism, speculation, and/or mysticism – all which are us striving towards God. But the reality of true Christian spirituality is that all human effort to reach God is futile. Christianity is all about what God does, not what we do.

Fluffy teaching may show me how to be positive, it may even help me become a better person. The Law is good at making us feel guilty about our sins and eager to try harder next time. The problem is, we always fail. We can never be good enough. That’s why we also need to hear the Gospel: Jesus Christ was credited with our sins and we are credited with His righteousness. What gets us into heaven isn’t how good we are, it’s how perfect Jesus is. Teaching with real substance uses the Law to show me my sin, but then shows me my Savior through the Gospel.

To purchase this book, follow the link below:

I’ve been reading Why We Love the Church: In Praise of Institutions and Organized Religion lately, and I ran across a great point I wanted to share:

“Fix-the-church books almost always figure that declining church attendance … means the church has messed something up. Even though the new crop of church books decry the old church-growth models, they still operate with the same basic assumption: namely, that churches should be growing and something is wrong with the church that isn’t.

This assumption, however, is alien to the New Testament. Didn’t Jesus say tell us that “the gate is narrow and the way is hard that leads to life, and those who find it are few” (Matt. 7:14)? Wasn’t the early church of Philadelphia commended by the Lord Jesus even though they were facing opposition and had “little power” (Rev. 3:7-13)? There is simply no biblical teaching to indicate that church size is the measure of success.

I’ve written before that ministry progress is not measured by numerical growth, but by the creation of disciples who make other disciples. But this post is exposing the double standard, those who would “have their cake and eat it, too.”

Authors like George Barna like to use statistics showing the decline in church attendance to damn the church, but then quickly defend the 5-person house church because “progress is not measured by numbers.” So if the institutional church is losing numbers, it is always because they are doing church wrong. But if organic churches are not growing, then it’s for some other reason. All I’m asking for here is fairness. Isn’t it possible that a particular church isn’t growing because it is rightly teaching Law and Gospel and people don’t like to hear it? Isn’t it possible that a particular organic church isn’t growing because of the home leader’s pride? It works both ways, which is why numbers are not a good indicator of spiritual maturity nor ministry progress, no matter what church model we’re discussing.

I saw this video from Matt Redman over at Kevin DeYoung’s blog. P.S. the expression “blokey bloke” is akin to our expression “manly man”:

Redman talks about how worship music has become romanticized and largely unscriptural. He says that “the church has been under-fathered and over-mothered.” Most of us are familiar with the “Jesus is my boyfriend” brand of popular worship music, but Redman also talks about how the cross no longer seems to be the focal point of worship music. The same seems to be happening in the pulpits, perhaps there’s a link here….