Daily prayer is and always has been a struggle for me. I don’t prioritize it like I should. I often neglect His Word and prayer. Lately I’ve taken somewhat of a hiatus from blogging to get in the Word more and to pray (plus many other areas of my life have been busy). If I don’t feed on God’s Word, the content on this blog can get pretty bad. I got a Christmas present that is helping me though, a book called the Treasury of Daily Prayer.

Essentially it’s a book that has daily readings from the bible and orders of prayer, and the entire Psalter (all the Psalms). Every day has an Old and New Testament reading, a psalm (or portion of one), and some general guides for prayer. I like it because everything is contained in one book, I don’t have to switch between my bible, a format, and a devotional (although I do enjoy using Eckardt’s Meditations for the Daily Office in conjunction with it sometimes). It’s all in one place. I’ve never been one to really get into any kind of formal prayer material, preferring spontaneous prayer and scripture over any prescribed format. But the bottom line is that when left to my own devices, I simply don’t pray or read the bible that often. If I do, I’ll most likely read a couple of bible verses then pray a 4-5 minute half-hearted prayer, during which I’ll succumb to my short attention span and begin thinking of something entirely non-related.

Understand that I’m not saying there is anything wrong with short prayers or scripture readings. I’m simply saying that I often resort to this approach out of laziness and a failure to prioritize God and His Word in my life. Perhaps you can relate. I’m not trying to push the Treasury of Daily Prayer or anything, I am just stating that it is really helping me get into the Word and prayer more (plus it was a fun project making my own ribbon bookmark for it).

What helps you pray? How do you make His Word a priority in your daily life?

UPDATE: Charles Lehmann made a great point in a comment on this post — the word tension would be better expressed as paradox. Read the helpful comment by clicking here.

This has come up before in a past post entitled The Great “Tensions” of our Faith. It got resurrected recently by a post at internetmonk.com entitled Spiritual Depression and the Search For the One True Church (I’d like to hear the opinion of the room.). iMonk writes about the depression which stems from trying to find theological truth. A commenter writes:

My “spiritual depression” is caused by the continual dueling (in my mind) of the various theologies within Christianity: Reformed, Wesleyan, Lutheran, Catholic, Orthodox, and on and on.

How can I know which, if any, are truly true? All have scads of brilliant and holy adherents. Is it all subjective? Just close my eyes and pin the tail on the donkey? As Lewis said, we cannot live in the hallway (mere Christianity.) We must choose a room.

To continue to study systematic theologies only seems to drive me further into “depression.” Yet it is like an unbreakable addiction.

iMonk was very interested in this and posed a series of questions for his readers. I commented in reply to it, and I decided to share my thoughts here. The following is what I wrote, and then I added some questions I’d like you to answer:

I don’t mean to sound too postmodern, but perhaps the reason it is so hard to grasp theology (and thus so easy to disagree with others’ conclusions) is because we are dealing with an infinite being, not a finite part of creation which we can dissect, study, and comprehend. Take the doctrine of the Trinity for example. No denomination is silly enough to presume to understand the mystery of tri-unity, yet we all believe it. Such theological thought has driven a friend of mine to say that “The Trinity is not a doctrine I believe, it’s a relationship I embrace.”

In reality, theology necessitates truths in tension. For instance, Jesus was fully man and yet fully God. Christians are sinners and yet also saints. God is absolutely sovereign yet man has free will. Jesus said “This is my body and blood,” yet it still looks and tastes like bread and wine. Grace is free, yet it is not cheap and it will cost you everything. The Law demands absolute perfection as the standard of holiness, and the Gospel promises imputed righteousness to all who believe upon Jesus. It’s no wonder theologians have drawn differing lines in the sand. I think doctrinal differences occur when we attempt to rationalize these apparent “truths in tension.”

What do you think? Do you think most doctrinal disagreements occur when we attempt to rationalize these “truths in tension” about our infinite and awesome God? What are other sources of theological contention? A huge movement is underway labeling itself as post-denominational, what does that word mean to you?

A popular notion today is that there is a clear dichotomy, or distinction, between sacred and secular. Such distinctions are commonly made by Christians in the areas of music and vocations. In music, for example, we have secular, or “worldly” music. And then we have Christian music, which is often regarded as being sacred (even though most “Christian” songs are just as secular as “worldly” songs).

But the area I’d most like to focus on is that of vocation, the employment positions we hold. For some reason we continue to foster this sacred/secular distinction for jobs: some people are called into ministry, and the rest of us hold secular jobs. But that’s not what the Bible teaches. All believers are called into full time ministry! It is not something reserved for a clerical professional – we are all called to be full time ministers in God’s present kingdom! Everyday life is sanctified by God, we have a whole life embracing, fully comprehensive Gospel for the transformation of all things. This affects every aspect of our lives.

Far too many today espouse the idea that ministry is an institution that is reserved only for the few who are “called” and “ordained.” The problem is, this (in practice) denies the priesthood of all believers. Ordination was fashioned in the fourth century after the Roman rituals of the appointment of public officials to office, and the church adopted this when the lines between church and state were blurred under Constantine’s rule. This distinction between clergy and laity still exists to this day.

Don’t believe me? Why do many traditional pastors still dress differently than us “normal lay people”? Point stated. To quote Frank Viola in his book Pagan Christianity?: Exploring the Roots of Our Church Practices:

The contemporary practice of ordination creates a special caste of Christian. Whether it be the priest in Catholicism or the pastor in Protestantism, the result is the same: The most important ministry is restricted to a few “special” believers. . . .

Tremendous psychological factors make laypeople feel that ministry is the responsibility of the pastor. It’s his job. He’s the expert is often their thinking. . . .

The clergy/laity dichotomy perpetuates an awful falsehood-namely, that some Christians are more privileged than others to serve the Lord.

Hmm, I think this is a problem. But don’t take my word for it, think for yourselves. I’m not calling for an abolition of hierarchical leadership in the church like Viola and Barna, but I do think a lot needs to change in the way we do church and recognize leaders.

The pastoral office is really not something God envisioned, not in the way we utilize it today anyways. George Barna did a study on pastors, and some of what he found was eye-opening. Did you know these startling statistics about pastors:

• 94% feel pressured to have an ideal family
• 81% say they have insufficient time with their spouses
• 80% believe that pastoral ministry affects their family negatively
• 70% do not have someone they consider a close friend
• 70% have lower self-esteem than when they entered the ministry
• 50% feel unable to meet the demands of the job
• 80% are discouraged or deal with depression
• 40% of pastoral resignations are due to burnout
• 1,400 ministers in all denominations across the United States are fired or forced to resign each month
• The average length of a pastorate has declined from seven years to just over four years

Do you still think this is of God. I know there are exceptions to all of this, some congregations are very understanding and whatnot, but a majority of pastors are asked to essentially conduct all of the local ministry of the church (or have their hand in it). Many pastors crumble under this pressure — and that’s because it wasn’t designed to work this way!

When we make the pastor a professional clergyman who is distinct from laity we begin to view ministry as something that is only his (or her) responsibility. One person is not meant to sport all of these hats! They just can’t! Only an every-member functioning Body can accomplish the ministry that is required to be done. It shouldn’t be “lonely at the top,” because we aren’t meant to live in a separate caste from one another! Remember what Paul said about the different parts of the Body of Christ (1 Corinthians 12). Too many pastors are trying to be the head (which is reserved for Christ), or they are performing all the other parts’ functions since they are not doing it.

Now pastors may say, “we have to do this because the congregation won’t ’step up to the plate’ and do what they demand from us.” May I contend that in order to get them to ’step up to the plate’ you must foundationally change the very way we do church! The current structure clearly doesn’t work. It has failed to produce anything but a passive laity who is utterly dependent on one man, their pastor, for the past 500 hundred years. I think some revolutionary change is in order. That change is Christianity 2.0.

There is no such thing as a “secular job.” I am called into the mission field and minister to my coworkers and those brought into my path. This is no less “sacred” than any pastor’s job. The Gospel is meant to transform our entire lives, not just our Sunday morning experience.